Chinese Wholesale Website Wholesale Electronics From China
all right so like i said in the
introduction i'm here with dr adam back
and samson mao gentlemen welcome back to
the show
thanks preston
thanks for having us on
hey so you guys i you know i'm checking
twitter and i'm seeing these feeds
coming out of the block stream website
and uh you guys got some big news to
announce the first thing was this uh
announcement of this modular mining unit
uh you guys are just going by uh the
acronym mnu
talk to us about what this is and what
kind of problem you're trying to solve
so
it's to uh
take mining closer to the power
producers
and
provide them with a way to
increase the um so to have a steady base
load
and increase the profitability of being
a power generator
and particularly for some intermittent
power sources
they uh
you know they when they build a new
sort of zero emission
um installation sometimes it takes an
extended period of time until they get
connected to the grid so this is
something that can provide them with
immediate power and then also the
um
the grid demands are variable
and maybe the power generation is
variable too so
you know they're they're in a business
they're trying to make an economic case
to get
uh project financing to build a zero
emission like um
you know a solar farm wind farm hydro
farm that kind of thing
and they have to make an economic case
for it and so having
a kind of buyer of last resort that's
standing by
to buy any excess power
helps them economically
to achieve the project financing and so
you know
what's uh the one of the differences
with the
block stream energy or modular mining
unit is that
the
um
the power producer buys the unit or
leases it in some form so it's their
equipment and in exchange for that they
have the right to sell power to it
and
so they are not exposed
by default to the bitcoin price they're
just able to sell power at what is
for bulk power produces an attractive
price and the reason we're willing to
pay this attractive price is because we
want the bitcoins
and
they've
you know they've bought the miner
effectively right so
we could if you if you buy the miner and
paid electricity you want a low
electricity bill if you're only paying
electricity bill
you can afford to pay a higher power
rate
and so we can pay an attractive power
rate
and
if they end up selling all of their
power to mining that's great if they
have
high grid demands
that's fine too
that just means they made their profit
in a in a different way
so in a way it's kind of a black box
that you're providing to energy
producers and they are effectively
mining but they don't necessarily need
to know or or deal with that aspect of
it they just have this uh machine that
buys power from them and it can make
their operations far more profitable
how much more energy and i know this
varies from energy producer to energy
producer but
uh what are you guys going after is it a
20
additional energy capacity for a for
your standard energy company that
they're kicking off that they're just
not using and they need that that uh
additional 20
to
handle peak demand or is it even larger
than that
depends on the type of power but
certainly
you know most grids are built
for the peak power and so they have
significant
unused power and of course many power
sources can be
variable levels so they can just turn it
down when the uh
power demands are lower but given an
example in
in a montreal quebec province of um
canada
about 50 of the power is unused so it's
uh it's mostly hydro so it's you know
just
bypassing the generators and pouring out
the sluice gates
and so
you know that's in sort of missed
economic opportunity they could sell
that
to mining
and
of course if there was a surge in power
demands they could turn the mining off
right so
now other kinds of power are are
variable for different reasons one is
you know solar obviously only works
in the in the daylights unless you have
batteries as well
and wind depends on the wind speed so
and similarly the power demands are
variable you know people turning on
uh yeah you know eating or having a hot
drink at the same time after watching a
football match or something it there are
sort of spikes for
residential
power habit reasons
and for industrial working hour you know
reasons when people are operating
industrial plants so
the power demands are all over the place
and some of these power
generation methods
are
um relatively efficient but take a while
to start up and a while to stop to to
wind down and so when they're producing
the power it has to go somewhere you
can't just you know keep generating it
and not not draw it or break something
like in the grid and so they actually
at times have to pay people
negative power rates to get rid of
temporary excess power as well so mining
can also fulfill that purpose
but meanwhile we have somebody from
forbes who's probably writing an article
right now about how
the energy use is going to uh take over
the the entire planet here in about six
months uh with bitcoin mining
the power is coming out right so like
here you got these waterfalls or however
they're harvesting the energy from the
from the hydro dams
and um
i mean it's going to produce this energy
one way or the other it's coming out
it's just it's just there for the taking
so
actually energy is quite abundant just
our ability to harness and transport or
transmit it is quite limited and i think
mining will be driving a lot of
advancement in in this sector to you
know improve upon that and
better harness energy overall so i think
there's a net positive here like you
need some new technology that moves
things forward
and the demand from for bitcoin mining
and the economic bonus that gives you is
that potential factor that can push us
ahead techno technologically
so adam you initially described like hey
we'll lease this we'll come we'll set it
up we'll service it and uh you pay us we
like come up with an agreement with what
energy rate will pay for uh that you'll
be providing to the the mining rig
um and we want to keep the bitcoin do
you find yourself in a situation where
you think uh energy producers are gonna
say nah just just give us the uh mnu
itself and uh we'll we'll keep the
bitcoin are you guys at that point or do
you think that they kind of like the the
structure of this right now
well
i mean for
sort of conventional
infrastructure
they uh
they may not be that familiar with
bitcoin so you know the prospect of
just getting paid conventionally
for the power with a power purchase
agreement
sounds good to them
and of course you know large-scale bulk
power
at the generation point is relatively
low cost
so that could be win-win but
you know there are other people we work
with like akka for example
ct
who are you know they funded their new
division for
bitcoin activities with bitcoin
and so
you know they're obviously much more
interested in
in getting a bitcoin so you know we can
construct a different way to
make that work economically
it's kind of a trojan horse because they
they will like this model now if they're
not familiar with bitcoin bitcoin mining
and the economic benefits but down the
road if they do learn more about it then
know we can shift the model of it and
orange build them
why are we letting these guys keep the
bitcoin and they're paying us the
yeah i love it um
talk to us about where you're at on the
development of the mnu itself because it
looks like it's it's coming as a package
deal had the sleek block stream logo on
the side of it and you guys obviously
have all the the hardware and
infrastructure inside set up you're
providing the service labor to make sure
this thing is is running around the
clock in case it runs into any hiccups
which i wouldn't suspect anybody wants
to try to take that on themselves that
you would be leasing this to anyway
but how far along are you guys in that
process have you shipped any are you
still in the developmental phase talk to
us about where you're at
so we have
mmus running
but obviously we're interested to scale
that up a lot more and
you know place them
around the world in
sites that have
i mean sometimes remote sites also so we
have the technology to
uh operate these using the block stream
satellite so we do have a bi-directional
version of the satellite
um which we've used for
you know as a as a backup to networking
for mining or as a you know potential as
a primary obviously
you know at this point
miners are in relatively
short supply
and so that's one of the the bottlenecks
for
bitcoin mining generally actually
not only do you guys have this
announcement you have another massive
announcement that just came out today
and we're recording this in the future
but it's it's gonna when this airs it's
coming out today you guys are getting
into the asics business so
i'm sure everybody everybody out there
is hearing this announcement just saying
oh my god
so talk to us about this what in the
world is going on at blockstream with
respect to asics
well i mean it's obviously a big part of
the
um
mining space and if you're
you know providing hosting
to
individuals and companies
access to supply chain for miners is a
is a factor and
so you know we work with a number of
manufacturers today but
we're interested to add some more
decentralization so an additional
manufacturer
um
built you know sort of more in the west
and internationally there's a lot of
manufacturing that's china dropshipping suppliers (https://suppliers.oem7.com) centric today
so it's good to have some kind of
geographic diversity
of where things are made and uh
yeah so we you know um obviously when
there's a shortage
for miners
as is the case today
the
supply and demand situation so the
prices tend to go up as well reflecting
that so it's also a good time
economically to
enter this space now um you know people
looking at the announcement but actually
we've been you know working on this for
probably a couple of years in the
background and under wraps and with
both spondulis uh who you know if you
look around on the internet you'll see
that they've been
uh making miners for a while and and the
spondylies team is joining blockstream
to form the blockchain mining division
so we've been working with them and the
foundry partner
for for a while now and so we're
projecting to have them in market uh q3
next year which is
i think faster than people would assume
if you just think that you know
somebody's
starting an activity and usually the r d
phase on a on a new minor would take you
know in excess of a year
and i think another factor with mining
is
it's very specialized area you need to
have deep expertise many people who've
tried it
you know from scratch have run into
issues or you know failed runs even some
of the big companies have
had technical failures
so
we have a lot of confidence in the
spondylies team they've made some very
nice equipment in the past which
we owned and operated in the past um
and so we're you know very interested to
bring a quality
enterprise grade miner to to market and
so you guys are going to have a lot of
ip in this or are you piecing together a
lot of different components that
doesn't necessarily have
ip for for block stream i'm just trying
to understand how much of the
manufacturer you guys are are doing and
how much of the intellectual property
for the initial launch of it
yeah so the way the acquisition of
spontaneous is structured is
uh actually is ip purchase
um
now of course you know bloodstream is um
you know has has participated in the
defensive
license
activities so we're generally a fan of
open intellectual property
and to you know create a level playing
field but obviously some of the
chip level libraries and
foundry level technologies are
covered by patents outside of air
control
so you know we're generally operating in
the
defensive pattern uh mode
as usual
but that's that's the way deal
structured and
you know we're
we're planning a road map for these
miners so we'll we'll seek to um
you know improve the space over time
samson did you have anything else you
want to add about the the announcement
yeah so
i think touching upon what adam was
mentioning i this is a a major thing for
the bitcoin mining industry
there have been very few manufacturers
outside of china and that does pose some
sort of a risk to the bitcoin network if
all the
production and manufacturing and
everything is based in one geographical
region
so you know having spondylies
under blockstream now helps us to
decentralize the production of
bitcoin miners and i think if we can
grow this business to the extent we want
to then we could become a potentially
major competitor in this space
and grab a large chunk of that market
share from the other manufacturers as
well
um
i think traditionally spondylitis has
been known for aiming for more
professional grade miners like they were
one of the first to try the um the 1u
form factor whereas everyone else was
doing the you know the shoebox style
bitcoin miners i think we want to keep
on going in that direction and aim for
more enterprise grade hardware
it's just easier to manage and i think
we'll be able to gain an advantage in
that area because
you can if you standardize the form
factor you can
you guys a lot more things and you know
swap out chips easier when they burn out
or
when they're uh no longer uh
you know cutting edge and just replace
the parts that you need to replace
i think a lot of miners are designed
with the obsolescence in mind but i
think what we want to go for is you know
minimizing waste on that side and
optimizing for efficiency
that's really interesting to hear you
talk about the swap ability of various
components inside the rig itself and i
think that that's going to be a welcome
change for many people in the space to
be able to upgrade without you know the
cost of replacing every single component
inside the rig let's go ahead and
transition to block stream finance adam
the last time we talked you were getting
ready to do your minor note for people
that maybe didn't hear that conversation
explain to them what the note is and
then i'm just i'm just kind of curious
how it turned out for the first tranche
that you guys did with the issuance
uh yes so the blockchain mining though
it was sort of reactive we had
you know people were aware that we were
doing
providing minor hosting for enterprises
and interest individuals were interested
to invest and so we've got a lot of
inbound requests instead of blockchain
mining it was partly a
you know a way to satisfy that demand
and
so it is actually a security token so
it's a proper
um security it's a via luxembourg
securitization vehicle provided by
stocker which is a
equivalent of a share registration agent
for for the note
and
uh financial aid structure a little bit
different so sort of um
we use the model that we arrived at
ourselves by mining for a number of
years which is to
uh fund it and not sell the coins as you
go so keep the coins to the end
um
and so it's pre-funded it's a three-year
note and
you know it's approximately the useful
lifetime of a minor these days
plus or minus and so
yeah it basically accrues the bitcoin
inside the note and at the end of the
period
the current holder
would receive the bitcoin
and
because it's um
a liquid security you know an actual
security token users can transact it so
today they can transact otc and there
seems to be
a decent amount of otc
transactions occurring
and there's a block stream finance
channel where people seem to be meeting
other buyers and we're also expecting
uh one or more exchange listings
in
you know in some months and so
that will provide another you know
hopefully price formation
and
we can find out what the market pricing
is for this kind of product honestly
it's sort of loosely
comfortable with other
mining activities that you can do and so
you know there should be some kind of
correlation between the prices of
different things in money space
now the demanding notes is you know if
you if you sell it before
maturity you would expect the current
value to reflect both the bitcoin
component and the remaining mining
component so let's say you sold it
one year into three year period and it
accumulated a certain number of bitcoin
that'll be part of it
plus
you know the remaining 24 months
value on the contract and actually today
you know so far it's been
people
got more interested and wish they'd
bought earlier basically we've done two
sales tranches and we'll probably do
another one and then obviously the
exchange listings later so i think
people like to see something operating
otherwise they feel like they're buying
it on spec and it's coming in three
months which was the original tranche
rent back in march
and so
you know there seems to be more interest
in uh buying it on a secondary market
now um
and it's been going pretty well you know
as i said the minor profitability is
quite high at present it's been making a
return of about
uh 0.3 a day so
if it were to keep going at that
trajectory it would recoup the capital
investment
uh
within a year and it's a three year
product now of course you know many uh
inputs to mining are variable the
bitcoin price
the hash rate of course the hash rate
depends on supply of asics and other
people you know building up power
infrastructure and
securing asics and putting them online
so we'll see how that
how that plays out but it's uh you know
people have been pleased with it so far
yeah it's quite interesting like uh when
we were socializing the concept of the
bmn one of the biggest questions we get
is you know why not just buy bitcoin why
why buy this and you know we we have uh
back tested models where in certain
situations it does uh become more
profitable to mine bitcoin than to buy
bitcoin
uh but you know typically those are
doing bear markets and and such but you
can also have that when there is a big
drop in hash rate so the timeliness of
the bmn is just great you know it
launched and then there was that massive
crackdown in china and you had that mass
exodus of miners
leaving or just shutting down a period
and the profitability as i mentioned
just spiked on the bmn if you're looking
at that just as investing in a
traditional financial instrument you
just ignore the bitcoin mining part you
know you're doing excellent
you're getting excellent yields on this
instrument here so i think a lot of
people were very happy and that's why
people are are trading at otc now
because they they want more of it and uh
the people that bought early were just
very prescient and you know they look
like they're geniuses
i would suspect that your your variance
would be way lower by owning this versus
owning bitcoin itself just as far as the
variability in in the price of the
security
yeah it's kind of a locked in
dollar cost average you know you've
committed to it and you're going to
average over time no matter what so in
in some ways it's better than dollar
cost averaging because you kind of
you're locked in and you're locked in at
a specific rate of acquisition yeah i
mean certainly in the back testing it
appears to
be the case
um
that
you get a lower volatility return
and that's partly because there's some
downside protection
historically so
you know if the hash rate if the price
falls
the hash rate falls
you mind more coins than you expected to
because of the mining strategy baked
into it you keep the coins to the end
and usually across the three-year period
you know there'll be
a price full and a price rise of some
significance and so we we actually did
something like that
a few years ago
at company level and
so basically
we started uh mining when the price of
this particular batch of miners
at a time when the price of bitcoin was
fifteen thousand dollars
and
at the end of the duration the price was
seven and a half thousand dollars but we
still made a 25 profit
so if you're looking at buying bitcoin
you lost 50 we made a 25 return instead
and if you you know at the time we were
we found this
surprising and so we you know we
embarked on all this analysis and
back testing to see you know often that
kind of thing would occur what the
average is basically to break apart why
that happened
it's because
at the bottom of the market the price
fell to you know 3 500 or something and
so
basically at mine two and a half times
as many coins as we projected and so
even the price was half it ended up
making a 25 return at the end and of
course
you know in effect we ended up keeping
those coins to the state at which point
you know that looks very good overall
competitor
into it but i think it's a very good
people don't have the intuition so they
will often
put money into mining
where they'll pay the power bills
uh by selling some of the bitcoin and
that's that's not a good idea in our
view because what you end up doing
is selling most of the coins at the
bottom of the market
because you know the percentage of the
coins you have themselves relate to the
price and at the bottom it's getting
near to break even and you'll be selling
like a big portion of the coins
and that's when you're accumulating and
that's what you know ultimately provides
the
downside protection in return
so we reflected that in a bmn note
structure basically so it's pretty the
power is pre-funded it keeps 100 of the
coins
and it has a relatively
uh cost-efficient administration fee
i think you can kind of say uh there's
two kinds of miners there are the miners
that are just in it for the profit and
it may make sense at a certain point in
time to do what adam was saying which is
you know they just sell off some coins
every month to pay for the power and
they're still incredibly profitable
right the cost to my mine one bitcoin
right now is you know six seven thousand
dollars and the price is pretty high
right now it's uh you know 449 4849 but
there's another type of miner which is
the the hodler miner so that miner is
really mining
to huddle and like for us we mine and we
keep everything like
we're not selling off every month to pay
the bills or pay operational costs and
in effect the bmn is turning people into
the hodler type miners because they're
locked in for that three year period so
they will accrue those benefits
uh because of that structure
i would think that so for a lot of
institutions right now they can't get
access to bitcoin just through sheer
charter limitations
does this vehicle provide them an
opportunity to invest in a debt
instrument that kind of bypasses some of
those charter limitations that they
might have by uh forcing them to own
some type of debt instrument
yeah we've we've actually seen that play
out so we had a couple people express
interest and financial institutions that
had those kind of internal
policy question marks where they don't
yet know how to institutionally own
bitcoin but they can own at luxembourg
security
and so
i think they felt that it was a
good way to start basically because at
the end of it they'll have bitcoin
and they'll have the option to
you know receive the dollar equivalent
or the euro equivalent but
you know by then they may be in a
position to
take physical positions
yeah so there they might have to sell on
the open market they might have to sell
it a day before the maturity which i'm
i'm guessing the the price of this is
just basically going to peg itself
straight to whatever underlying bitcoins
associated with the account right before
it matures so they're able to sell it on
the secondary market or in the public
market right before it matures and then
they bypass all of this
but yeah like you said maybe
maybe by then they'll be able to take
physical custody of the of the coupon
yeah
i think there's three ways to do it
either you're buying an a bitcoin
tracker an etf or something like the bmn
uh but all are viable ways for those
those types of entities to hold bitcoin
indirectly i think
i think there is an added benefit of
holding the bmn because it is a
luxembourg security uh it will have an
icin number it can be held by any
securities broker or any type of
financial
entity like that so it it plays very
well into that kind of uh market segment
so when when are you going to do it in
the u.s
we're working on that
we're working with inx so we'll see what
we could do oh okay all right
so and i mean i think another advantage
of it being a security is the brokerages
will
give margin credit basically
so a credit line
for trading or other purposes held
against the stocks and bonds in a
portfolio saying so you potentially need
a way to get leverage against a bitcoin
relay product
i think with the grayscale you cannot
borrow against it but you could borrow
against a bmn
oh that's interesting so let's go down
that path because that was the next path
i wanted to talk to you guys about so
you got a lot of people out there they
have substantial bitcoin positions they
don't want to sell them right they
they'll do anything to avoid selling
their bitcoin to pay for whatever
expense they might have so if they want
to go buy a house let's say they want to
buy a 500 000 house and let's say they
got 500 000 worth of bitcoin
they're not going to sell their bitcoin
realize the capital gains and buy the
house they want to borrow
you know they want to they want to put
down a down payment of 50 or 100 000
and they want to
use their bitcoin in order to
basically take out a loan to put down
the down payment or whatever that is
whatever gymnastics we want to play with
this but anyone who understands bitcoin
isn't going to sell it so
how are you guys thinking about
providing a solution to that
quandary
for anybody that understands bitcoin and
wanting to use it to buy real estate or
any type of large expense in their life
right so as you know we acquired um
adamant capital and we've branded that
and or rolled it into blockchain finance
so the bmn is issued under the
blockchain finance umbrella but we do
have plans to uh launch a number of uh
innovative bitcoin instruments um we're
thinking about doing a an alpha fund so
similar to the one that adamant was
doing originally so
you invest bitcoin and you get returns
on bitcoin uh we've kicked around the
idea of doing a us dollar
alpha fund
i'm calling it the plunge protection
fund so this would be a us dollar fund
where we would take some of the capital
to invest in uh you know stable yield
uh areas and then take some of it just
to place limit orders and buy bitcoin
whenever there's a big dip so in effect
it's plunge protection
but admin adam and i also talked about
doing some more mortgages under the
blockchain finance brand too because i
think that is something that bitcoiners
do want you know so much like you said
people don't want to sell but they want
to say buy a house or an apartment or
something
yeah i mean i think the key is to get
the lending rates down because
mortgage lending rates are quite low
with you know zero interest rate
policies and so on
um and bitcoin related finance rates
tend to be quite high because there's a
shortage of dollars
uh to use for leverage in the system you
know i think that's because
ultimately
anybody who's interested in bitcoin
tends to get heavily invested into
bitcoin and run low on dollars
and so you know they picks they've
largely exhausted their
dollar liquidity
and that puts the price up of bitcoin
related liquidity and of course
you know there are large amounts of
fiats in in the system in general you
know in
fixed income
in bonds
in pension funds that are
getting very very low rates and so
you know you would wonder that those two
things should normalize eventually but i
think for the moment
they're hesitant to
place funds into bitcoin uh exchange
margin lending and things like that
so it means that at least so far the
lending rates against bitcoin have been
a bit high to use as
you know collateral for
a house let's say
so i mean as as you were hinting one
thing that people could do and i expect
some people are doing this is take a
you know smaller loan against bitcoin
like a 10 percent loan against bitcoin
put at the down payment and then get a
conventional mortgage
on the rest right try to get as large
higher leverage mortgage as i can
because the mortgage rates will be low
and that'll bring down their average
cost of lending and reduce the
liquidation risk as well because the
bitcoin secured part is
then percentage very small so i think
that's the kind of interim thing the bmn
you know because it's
normal collateral you might be able to
get directly lower rates on it if you
give it to a broker
you just got to find some type of
mortgage house that
understands
all of this and understands the risk
associated with that type of collateral
being used
and it seems like that's the biggest
hurdle right now is finding a company
like your company that can bridge that
gap and provide that offering to the
clientele that i think is exploding
right now
um all around the world that's demanding
a product like this but it just doesn't
exist because we're just so early
um
but yeah man i hope you guys pull it off
soon you might be going to adam back to
get a mortgage loan i i i hope so
i mean to be quite honest with you i
mean anybody who's who's selling their
bitcoin right now to make a substantial
purchase like that i think they're crazy
i think they're nuts
but yeah obviously obviously we see the
world through a different lens than most
people
so the lightning network seems to be uh
just taken off right now it seems like
there's
numerous incentives that are driving
this adoption and this use
we're seeing it with the rewards cards
we're just seeing really innovative
wallets that are enabling lightning
transactions
i'm kind of curious to hear what you
guys think is like one of the driving
forces of why lightning is taking off at
this point
and then any other thoughts that you
guys have on kind of where you see it
going as far as like a projection into
the next year or two uh yeah so we've um
you know blockstream is one of the
sort of three main developers of
our lightning core protocol so the c
lightning team of blockstream has been
working on core protocol work but we've
also
released recently something called
green light
which is an interesting
uh server assisted
way to
to do lightning and the trade-off is it
provides the same kind of
um improved reliability and lower
latency that you get from a hosted
lightning wallet
while actually having the keys yourself
so how it works is
we uh
we modularized c lightning
so there's a module called hsm which
contains the keys
and does the key operations and normally
that's just a software module inside c
lining but what we did is they
separated those so you have that
key management on a client
it can verify enough to be secure
and then the server is
sort of doing the routing staying up to
date with the
network state
tracking the status and up time of nodes
and so when you come to make a payment
it's much faster and there's less
kind of traffic going backwards and
forwards
[Music]
to between a client and some of the
clients are you know intimately
connected or low bandwidth devices so
that will generally make for a more
reliable
experience
so we announced a couple of uh
launch partners who are using it we're
hoping that we'll see
you know more
lightning
software companies use that as a way to
improve lightning
certainly lightnings
you know assets in network
and
uh growth rate of that have been
increasing greatly
i think
it's it's proven to be pretty good for
kind of lower value
retail faster faster payments and you
certainly saw a lot of interest in that
in
el salvador now that's primarily driven
off of lightning
so adam help me understand the tech so
you said server assisted so i have my
own full node here at the house um if i
didn't want to go out and set up my own
full node i can basically outsource this
to a server that you're running but yet
i'm still holding the private keys and
so you're basically running the node for
me but yet i still have control of the
part that's important is that am i
understanding that correctly that's
right yeah that's exactly it so
like most people are using spv wallets
now so they're just uh they're not
running their own full node but you know
their keys are still on their phone or
on their device
and you know you're really using you
know some electrum server somewhere else
so in in some ways this is a parallel of
that so you have your own
your keys stored locally uh perhaps on
your phone and then block stream is
running this uh lightning infrastructure
in the cloud and the great thing here is
it solves one of the biggest problems
which is channel management so
like we don't have this right now but
down the road we will be doing a lot of
that balancing and channel management
for end users so you don't have to deal
with that complexity
you don't have to worry about being able
to route payment successfully and
all that stuff that you want to abstract
away from the end users for them
the most important thing is lightning
just works i can just pay someone if i
have enough money in my wallet and it'll
just work perfectly so i think this is a
really good step because with greenlight
you can also take that node in the cloud
and run it locally when you are
more established and more familiar with
all this stuff so
it's kind of the best of both worlds you
can onboard the beginners into this
system and they can off-board and all
the while they have their own keys and
full control over their funds
so you had mentioned uh the channel
management and for people maybe not
familiar with how complex this can get
just kind of give a generic
example of what you mean by the channel
management and then also i know there's
a lot of work right now taking place
where people are trying to come up with
like statistical models in order to find
the the fastest path for larger scale
transactions like if i want to send five
thousand dollars over lightning it's
extremely difficult today just because
of the channel management issues
but based on some of these new
algorithms that people are coming out
with you're going to be able to conduct
the transaction of that size fairly
easily and fairly quickly through like
these dynamic models that are then able
to sniff out where there's
uh channel capacity in order to route
this through multiple different nodes
i think one of the problems is that
as a new user when you connect
a channel
uh you fund it and
that means you can send
lightning bitcoin but you can't receive
because you can only receive if there's
funding coming towards you
so we've been working on a few things i
think c lightning was the first to have
uh dual funded channels
so you can create a channel where
there's funds coming from both sides so
sort of like a coin join going into a
channel in a way uh spend from both
parties uh to set it up and so the
the channel capacities come somewhere in
the middle um
the other problem that sometimes occurs
is that the
you know the spending habits are pushing
all the funds towards one end and so
your channel is getting balanced
and
in theory you should be able to
[Music]
rebalance them
by sort of
you know if i have two channels and one
is getting low
i can kind of send money to myself
from out one channel and in the other
channel via some other people
and that that's the theory but in
practice
um it tends to deplete channels in
between so you're kind of you know
trying to do a complicated rebalancing
job there
so that's that's where it gets
more interesting and then the capacity
issue you mentioned
where
people would find that as you increase
the amount you're trying to spend
it will get less reliable and that's
because you know there'll be some
channels
that you might route through but don't
have enough for that payment and so
there's been some work in the last year
or so on these multi-path
payments
where you can pay somebody with parts of
the liquidity coming via different
channels
so if there are enough enough channels
then that will work also
so right now when i look at uh wallets
that you could have on your phone it
looks like mun and uh blue or some of
the best like user interface type
uh wallets for lightning type
transactions i'm curious because i know
you guys have a green product you also
have aqua
i'm curious if you're going to be
bringing some of those types of
capabilities from a user experience kind
of vantage point where it's just i don't
have to think about it i can just do it
um is that in the works or kind of where
are you guys at with with your thinking
on that
definitely we want to get it into green
and aqua we want to
you know give access to block stream
green green light in those two wallets
yeah i mean in some ways it's uh it's a
simpler program model so i think it
should simplify
uh integrating lightning
into a smartphone wallet
and
i don't i don't want to so as far as i
know at least
uh until
you know last year maybe it's improved
now but blue wallet was kind of
custodial right so it's the server-side
model
um
and so
i think people do that
because of the usability
uh you know lower latency high
reliability
and i think also they can kind of share
channel capacity so they can have fewer
channels so less less things to
rebalance
i mean one one factor with rebalancing
as well as the cost because
you can you can rebalance channels but
if you have to create a new channel
that incurs maintained fees and when the
traders get busy in a bull market the
bitcoin main chain fees get pretty high
so
with uh
with blockstream we also have a liquid
network
and
sea lightning or lightning can in
principle work on top of the change so
we have lightning on top of
liquid as well
um and that's a way to
you know get get lower fees and
potentially
channels with other assets in them like
a channel with tether for example so
for people that are using tether
often that is for trading or even
business to business transactions
internationally because it's a cheaper
faster
wire transfer basically
um
but you know for for the smaller
payments if it gets used for that okay
that kind of use case or for more scale
then uh
lightning
tether or liquid is another
distinct possibility or other stable
coins you know there's also the canadian
dollar
the euro as a euro stable coin by side
swap and there are a number of staple
coins
there was a person on twitter asking
about mesh nets
um
i'm i think we're still talking about
kind of the same technological space
here but make me smart on on meshnets
so
there is um
some
sort of uh
emerging market
concept that people try to build which
is to use the block stream satellite to
get
um
the bulk data
so so they'll have a situation where
uh high-capacity
bi-directional internet is expensive
and so
with blockstream satellite we're sending
the history to sync a bitcoin node and
more recently we also added
lightning gossip data so you can keep a
lightning node up to date
on on the satellite
and
then you still have some
like
direct connectivity because the
satellite service on offer to
you know buyers of the base station
today
is receive only
so they're going to be using bandwidth
but it will reduce their send bandwidth
which will be going over you know 2g or
3g which is
locally expensive in some markets
and so
one concept was to use mesh networks or
wi-fi hubs to repeat
and broadcast that through a local area
through a village or a marketplace or
something like that so that you could
share the
bulk satellite data for
running a full node or participating in
the lightning network
and so the mesh is it's very interesting
technology obviously it's a way to
kind of have a
onwards broadcast repeating
kind of peer operated network rather
than a conventional network operated by
you know
a cell phone provider or something like
that
it's kind of a peer-to-peer internet and
we also have a
we have a integration with gotenna so
they are
a producer of the meshnet dongles so you
can actually use that already in the
wild today and you use gotenna with
blockchain satellite to send the
transaction through a mesh net up
through the satellite and you know
there's no need for internet at that
point really
so that's fascinating so are you guys
using the wi-fi signal then to do that i
i know samson you just said this gotenna
so i don't know what frequency that's
operating on but so
your your your satellite is broadcasting
the signal of the blockchain right then
it's hitting some type of hub
you're using gotenna or even a wi-fi
router to then distribute it uh
throughout whatever community is are you
using the wi-fi signal or are you on
different bandwidths what do you guys
use so the gotenna is a different
spectrum
wireless network wireless yeah wireless
okay so it's hot by hop and so the
concept is that
you know you'll find your way through
the network
and if it's a message that needs to go
to the internet proper somewhere in the
mesh network will be people running 3g
data or something like that so
now part of the concept that
goten are also interested in is micro
payments using lightning itself so that
the you know the use of this picture
bandwidth can
be managed you know not saturated by one
user or something like that
so it's a way to do quality of service
metering
that's fascinating and i would think
that there'd be a huge demand for this
in smaller towns remote locations
whatnot i mean wow
interesting i didn't know you guys were
uh working on that
um we're working on a lot of stuff
yeah i'd say you guys are working on a
lot of stuff um
speaking of working on a lot of stuff i
know the the el salvador announcement
was just kind of making the airwaves
whenever adam and i talked last
i'm curious if they've reached out to
block stream or you guys have reached
out to them in reference to doing the
mining there with the volcano or any
other type of activities down there
because i mean if it's now a legal
tender in the country i would imagine
that they are trying to set up as much
infrastructure as possible so i'm
curious what you guys have or
if anything
yeah right now our discussions are
mostly around
the bond so we had a call with them a
couple weeks ago
to talk about potentially doing
bonds
on the liquid network using our asset
management platform
so
that could be an interesting way for
them to tap into some more of that
geothermal energy that's powering
a lot of their grid right now but it is
costly so i think what you would need to
do is
uh sell a bond take some of the proceeds
from the bond and build up more of that
energy generation infrastructure
and then
get into mining and i think proprietary
mining would be the best bet because
geothermal power is typically more
expensive than say hydro but if you're
just prop mining and let's say it is a
component of that bond offering
like the bond is backed by some portion
of hash rate then i think it'd be fine
if the cost is higher than say hydro
yeah i think you're uh
i think your new model here by selling
hash rate via bond vehicle is just going
to flip fixed income on its head here it
just it just needs more time like
anybody in the fixed income space that's
ignoring this is
holy moly
it's always that way like uh you know
when you're pushing at the
boundary of all this technology and
innovation
you can do a lot of interesting things
that most people
in traditional markets will not really
think about because
you know that's not available to them
right they can't really securitize
hashrate
yeah
yeah give it a couple years
hey i wanted to ask you about um just
the gaming industry in general um
when am i going to be able to like watch
a nintendo game and and like instead of
running around collecting mario coins
we're running around collecting uh
satoshi's
like what's what's this progression take
because you guys are obviously at the
forefront of this idea um there's some
other companies out there that are
starting to incorporate sats via
lightning network
uh into their games uh i saw will reeves
had a really cool announcement where
he's basically doing pokemon go with but
with his fold app you can walk out in
front of a store
say it's starbucks they can go out in
front of their store and like literally
sprinkle
some ar
augmented reality satoshi's in front of
their store and then anybody who has the
app can see that there's
there's free satoshi's in front of the
starbucks and i can go over there and i
can walk into the store and order a
coffee and collect some satoshi's off
the ground so and like that's already
happening so yeah how does this evolve
into like the major gaming companies and
do you see this kind of
what's this trend look like just kind of
give us some of your thoughts sampson
well the
the playing field is wide open i think
we're still in the very early days of uh
applying a lot of this technology into
the gaming and entertainment space even
um there's zebedee i think they're the
ones pushing forward on a lot of the
play for sats uh integrating it into a
lot of mini games and things like that
there's also the nft contingent i saw
some people commenting on your tutorial
thread saying talk about nfts uh well i
think light knight has a lot of their
game items as nfts and then my game
infinite fleet we're also pursuing the
nft route uh we're also adding a
cryptocurrency for the game currencies
so replacing world of warcraft gold but
with a crypto asset that is fully
portable and can plug into you know all
this ecosystem built up around bitcoin
because as a liquid asset you have
access to all that with uh you know
block stream jade you can set up a
multi-sig and store your game currency
in a multi-sig wallet
which is very interesting um you can
conduct uh atomic swaps for the the game
nfps so the ships for the game currency
so you don't need a trusted third party
to intermediate that transaction players
can fully transact peer-to-peer
and i think that opens up a new model
where
trade can be
greatly expanded
and you don't have to worry about
getting ripped off in the trade so your
aqua wallet versus your green wallet do
you see and maybe i'm characterizing
this the way i'm thinking that it is but
i'm more asking this that the aqua
wallet do you see this more of an nft
type
um i'm playing this game and it's giving
me these tokens and i can basically
bring those tokens into my aqua wallet
and swap it into bitcoin if that's what
i ultimately want to hold versus that
that token
is that how you guys see aqua playing
into it versus green which is just
purely uh a bitcoin wallet like what's
the difference between those two well
both aqua and green support uh bitcoin
and liquid i think aqua aims to be more
seamless so it's all in one view so you
see bitcoin uh liquid bitcoin and all
the liquid assets as if it was one thing
even though it's two chains whereas in
green you're toggling between the two
different chains
and i think green is aiming more towards
power users like people concerned more
about privacy
you know we have
uh tour functionality in there but aqua
i would say is more leaning towards
surfacing these liquid assets
uh having on-ramps so we have
integration with wire in aqua and i'd
like to get more and more things plugged
in there i think there's a number of uh
different exchanges that now have uh you
know buy bitcoin easily easy on-ramps
and there's things like fast bitcoins we
want to integrate side shift side swap
just ways to convert assets easily in
aqua for you know people that are
more interested in assets than just you
know super secure bitcoin storage
now i interrupted you you were finish
your thought if you can remember where i
interrupted you on the gaming side yeah
so
it's just really like where we can see
it going with uh this technology like
crypto assets lightning stats and nfts
in the games industry so
i think there's just a great potential
here to integrate a lot of technology to
facilitate trade uh facilitate more open
markets around these ecosystems
um
i think it's difficult to like the holy
grail is people think you can take one
buy one item in game a and take it into
game b
i think that will be challenging just
because of the business model around
that you know yeah if i'm electronic
arts i don't want you know a ubisoft
player to take their gun into my game
because that's a lost sale
but what we could see is you know within
the umbrella of ea games they can have
free-flowing assets because that's all
their own ecosystem and business and you
see the same like for ubisoft or
activision
or for exordium which is what we're
trying to do too with the inf currency
and those nfts do you really think that
they need a blockchain to do that i mean
you're seeing a lot of this in the
gaming space right now where they're
managing whatever ledger they've got for
uh whatever scarce digital items they
have in their game
does it really have to come to a
blockchain or is there a big incentive
for them to uh
enforce through encryption that the
scarcity of this is is maintained it
just doesn't seem to me like like that
would necessarily be the case
well yeah i think i think it's like a
interoperability
level
so
you know
you could uh use a central
website from the game producer
potentially but then that's not going to
integrate very well
with uh you know a crypto exchange or a
wallet
so it's it's a kind of online account
right so
i think cryptocurrency and bitcoin
introduce people to a different model of
thinking about things
so then being our treat other assets in
that way is um
it's convenient i guess and it also
makes it
verifiable so you know we've been
talking about them as nfts but
essentially they are
game artifacts
that you can you know bring out into a
wallet you can gift to somebody give
somebody an artifact
you can sell it you can swap it
or you can put it into the wallet then
you put it back into the game
so i think it's kind of open network
um
you know trying open network theory on
games because
traditionally they've been quite
controlling you know they try to
deter or prevent people from
buying things or farming you know mining
things
by uh employing people to play the game
and then sell the sell the items on a
grey market so rather than fight it it's
kind of embrace the open networking
and see where that goes and
i think that's a more user-friendly
thing to do actually and generally
in other segments open networks have
tended to win because it enables
more third-party innovation so it's
easier for somebody to make
you know
an auction site or a swap site or a swap
wallet and it will all work together
right so the same technology can be used
for
swapping
you know tethers for bitcoin as swapping
you know swords for bitcoin and
it technology wise so you know for
example the side swap
wallet has an integrated
uh marketplace where basically users can
enter orders so they can they can build
their own market for for uh for an asset
that siteswap didn't you know
directly support but just the user setup
market
yeah i think they have uh bj's on
sideswap now i saw something like that
cool
yeah but uh
to answer your question i think it's
really about that permissionless element
um you could do something and you know
use some
signing or whatever but ultimately if
you're not using something like liquid
it would still be in a central
repository or a centralized system which
is prone to you know abuse and control
by whoever's
managing that system and the problem is
when you get into things at scale
um you you you have the apple app store
thing where you know they control all
the apps now and it wasn't like that in
the beginning but you know when that
system grew and they achieved that level
of dominance and ubiquity then you know
they're effectively now the gatekeeper
but if you are using something like
liquid you kind of guarantee that that's
external to that say game company right
they'll never be able to you know grab
your assets or lock your account and
take your funds from you right you'll
have that in your non-custody wallet
and ultimately it just gives people back
control over their their their things
right whether it be bitcoin um usdt or
you know a game sword or a spaceship or
a game currency and
the the goal is really just to make
things more bearer to go back to that uh
that system that existed before
everything is centralized in a database
you know things are yours you have it in
your in your control
so i really respect both of your
technical expertise and so i'm curious
what you guys think about something like
stacks
um
trying to do decentralized finance on
top of bitcoin
um stacks is just one of many different
things out there that are trying to do
this you have root stock
um but it seems like any solution that
that pops up has another token that's
associated with it that then is trying
to peg itself either to bitcoin or it's
just its own standalone protocol at its
own base layer so
i'm i'm curious how you guys view this
and how this is going to mature and i
keep hearing rumors that you know defy
can find its way through somehow on
lightning
how do you guys see this kind of playing
out long term
yeah i mean i think that
um
john pfeffer has an interesting
uh
i started started as a
kind of uh
collection of thoughts for himself and
he shared it with some friends and it
went viral so it's called an
institutional
investors take on uh cryptocurrency
something like that
so it basically describes
his analysis and thesis that
bitcoin is an asset class and that
utility tokens
that
are used to
you know create smart contracts or store
names or whatever the features of old
chains that are
um
won't ultimately
hold on to value so his his argument
amongst other amongst other arguments is
that the uh
it doesn't make sense on a business
level to pre-buy
um a utility token it would be like you
know
you decided to buy a million bus tickets
well you're not going to do that you're
going to buy the bus ticket when you
need the bus ticket
you might buy a week pass but that's
about it right
so
and generally the thing that you're
buying
you know networks get cheaper discs get
cheaper so if you were to
you know pre-buy
bandwidth in 1990 for the next 20 years
you have a very bad time because you've
paid a fixed price and the price has
fallen by you know multiple orders of
magnitude
so
i think that you know his argument is
that businesses that want to use the
smart contracting features of a
particular chain
it would make sense for them to to buy
the utility tokens to to use it just in
time right otherwise they have the
inventory cost which is which is not
helping them so of course that's
you know kind of
there's a lot of marketing around it and
that has
supported higher prices but if we accept
that that's the economic fundamentals of
it then the market can't remain
kind of irrational indefinitely
and it will come back to
you know the incremental
network cost rather than a specular
speculative value
and so i think that you know bitcoin is
different in that regard in
being a digital commodity
so adam you're basically saying and i
want to get over to you adam but
basically what you're saying is this
whole 1559
update to ethereum where it's it's
claiming to be ultrasound money
can't last
you're saying that it has to debase
itself in a way where it can't be
deflationary are you is that what you're
saying
well i mean the the collection of uh
alternative chains they're uh
something like ten thousand of them now
it's it's growing rapidly right so
clearly there is not
in that
that much scarcity
and
i think it's been a while since i looked
but somebody was producing graphs of
you know
a huge collection of coins versus
bitcoin and you know across a two to
three year period
they would go up and they'd go down and
then new ones would cycle in so that's
you know it's generally
sort of coins go out of favor basically
the people that
started them or promote with them move
on to the next thing and the price is
full so
i think that it's uh you know nobody's
debating the smart contracts are
interesting
but what they're saying is that
the
the value is a kind of network
uh
utility value
so you know what does it cost in the
network and if it gets too expensive
they switch chains and you see quite a
bit of that going on today
you know when people are moving
uh tether
they'll switch to other chains um
readily you know so it's kind of like
you know you've got a search engine
another one's better they'll switch the
one provides more accurate results
they'll switch
so
it shows that the switching cost is not
very high
um if the fees go up
because things get congested they move
to another chain
generally
there's this new acronym which is
uh the dyno the decentralized name only
so i think that actually
in terms of utility
the dinos uh are
the more centralized the better in a
sense you know they can market it as
being decentralized but if it's very
centralized it's easier to scale well
easier to put a high throughput because
you know they can put high-speed
computers in a data center basically um
so yeah i mean i'm not i'm not very
i'm sort of bearish on
the long-term value potential even
though i'm
bullish on the use case of smart
contracting and innovation about that
and so people need to i think
separate the
you know the fundamentals of the
economics
from assuming
just kind of
i would argue groundless inference that
because there's utility in a network the
price should go up you know there are
multiple networks these are open source
networks people can copy them ad
infinitum and they are
and so i think that you know the cost
will
fall to the network operating cost um
and there's lots of competition so
it should we should ultimately get an
efficient market
sampson yeah so
you know
i don't think you need to add a token
onto any protocol and the liquid network
success
is a testament to that fact
that you don't need to bolt on some
token to make something successful in
fact i think bolting on a token
generally will pervert incentives it
it's good short term you know you know
people you quickly align people to be
interested in the price of this thing
and you can gain adoption quickly but i
think for us at blockstream we're in it
for the long term we want to build
something right the the first way around
so you know we didn't add a token to
liquid there is no token we've grown to
1.1 billion in assets in the network and
we see a lot of growth in that ecosystem
too people building on this protocol
because it is open and permissionless
anybody can become a member of the
network and build on top of it so you
have things like tdax side swap you know
they're all heavily leveraging this
huddle huddle too i think they want to
build a
version of their platform that's based
on liquid and same for bisque
because it makes sense and i think
ultimately a lot of these other projects
missed the mark if you're building
something now for whatever reason if
it's for smart contracts or whatever
great but if you're not including
some privacy enhancements to it
it's really just more of the same thing
it's more of the legacy system and in a
new technology format which is not very
interesting to me
i think
without that added
dimension of privacy then it's really
just meaningless it's not going to
survive any
any attacks or any threats uh
it just will crumble when when the
when they're put to the fire right like
adam said it's decentralized in name
only uh i think
to gain that uh
order of magnitude in functionality you
do need that privacy component right
you need something better so if you have
a smart contract you still want
to have that privacy like the way that
we're trying to build some things is
that you know you can have that smart
contract but you don't need to reveal it
to the world right away
you just can reveal it as needed
you know and adam can speak more to that
because that's more his ballpark but i
think for everything that we're doing
privacy is a key part of that so the
lightning network improves privacy for
all those transactions the liquid
network has confidential assets and
transactions and i think what we're
going to be doing with smart contracts
will also have a degree of privacy to
that as well
and to the point adam you were bringing
up i see it uh very similarly as you
with respect to the deflationary
uh token part of it and how that does
not benefit somebody who's using that
protocol
in a commodity or
having utility that you're paying for
the processing associated with that
protocol so i see it similar to
just how you see fiat currencies
interacting with each other today like
the euro versus the dollar
if the dollar's debased and it's
inflationary and um it has all those
attributes it's sucking euros into the
us because europeans can now get cost of
of products and services way cheaper
than what they could before so that
utility through the debasement of the
dollar has forced
other currencies to come into it and and
to uh be used and i think you might run
into a similar dynamic and i think this
is what you were describing when you
were talking about your concerns with
something that would be a deflationary
token on these protocols is you're not
incentivizing the use in the utility of
the smart contracts that are then
happening on that protocol and you're
actually incentivizing the other
protocols that are trying to do all this
stuff at the base layer to be used is
that am i describing that accurately
well i'm i'm just saying that um this
this is john faffel's argument but you
know you can arrive there
through different
and you think about from different
directions or from a technology
direction as well but
basically that
um
the
transaction
uh
cost in the network so i think there's
two two aspects to the value one is the
utility value like
how valuable is this transaction you
know what economic benefit did you get
from it
could you run it cheaper somewhere else
and there are many compatible and
competing platforms right so
that means the fundamental
value if you shop around look for the
cheapest way to run it
is pretty low like
cents or something and yet
there are people marketing these tokens
as
you know
something called lasting
value but
it does it doesn't make fundamental
economic sense so i think markets can
you know sustain a price
that doesn't make sense uh for a while
but eventually
you know the fundamentals kick in and
you see that with something like
you know i think some of these markets
are a bit inverted so
you know why why did gamestop you know
shoot up in price well it's because a
bunch of guys on reddit
thought it'd be funny to
you know show their combined strength
and
try to do a short squeeze
because they thought it was uh you know
because they knew it was heavily shorted
now maybe it deserves to be heavily
shorted but they knew it was so heavily
sure that they could cause a short
squeeze anyway
and so they did that for a while but
obviously you know that failed
ultimately and things things so it's
like gravity you know something will
tend to fall to its
fundamental value
and so i think you know the fundamental
value is just really what is it what
does it cost
and it should get cheaper in future so
you know if if the utility token
is covering
you know the cost because there's a lot
of competition the utility value should
just encompass the cost of providing the
operation the cost of providing the
operation goes down over time so the
fundamental value should fall over time
so it doesn't make sense to pre-buy
tickets into it
and so that's it really you know i think
the rest is
kind of marketing or people
maybe misapplying
um
company valuation metrics right so they
will
you know look at the assets
that the foundation behind a coin has
and think that
you know the coins
represent ownership of those assets i'm
pretty sure they don't you know on a
legal basis right they're not you know
if if you buy shares in a company and it
has assets
of course there's a liquidation value
and ultimately you could have a hostile
takeover so you could buy enough shares
and you know get the assets and that
happens in the physical world from time
to time but there's definitely i'm
pretty sure that's not the case with
you know any kind of icos or
coin tokens so people have applied those
metrics to it and so i think it's just
you know temporary
evaluation
mistakes and of course there's a kind of
shared incentive to do that because it's
uh people enjoy trading so i think they
will you know play along because uh
you know being able to buy something
uh you know there are sort of early
stage investors and so they can make
money on it based on naivete of
later investors i think
or it's just pure speculation
yeah
okay this is my last question for you
guys uh
this this this infrastructure bill
what are your comments on just the
regulatory policy uh takes that you're
getting out of the sec with ginsler
um you're just hearing a whole lot of
takes and opinions as to the direction
that this is going is it all noise
is it something to pay attention to does
it not matter in the long term kind of
what are some of your thoughts on on
this idea
so i think um
it was a bit disappointing obviously
the way that that went in the sense that
it looked like
they were going to
improve it so that would be less
problematic
but then it got vetoed at the end for
some kind of tactical reason like a
blanket veto of all changes or something
so
it just shows you yet again the politics
is kind of disorganized and you know
random last minute haggling so it's not
a good formula to arrive at
you know uh
considered and sensible regulation that
doesn't get in the way of innovation um
so that that's a bit messy um
i think a lot of what gensler is talking
about is actually consumer protection so
uh reading between the lines it looks
like he's talking about
uh rug pulls hacks
people losing money i think
you know while people are making money
they're less likely to get upset
complain to a regular air during a class
action but if there's a sudden you know
90 drop in something or something gets
hacked
in a large scale people get upset and
regulators get concerned about
consumer safety so i think you can
you know chalk that up to the
ongoing
kind of insecurity of a number of chains
really and it's not clear you know i
mean some of them are
hacks and some of them are hacks in air
quotes like maybe the
anonymous people that created it
pretended to hack it and actually took
the money
um
or some of them
are just
you know centralized so essentially the
people who set it up
could take the funds at any time and
they chose to do so
and so that happens too so there's
there's a range of
you know or another one is people
involved in it just selling heavily
shortly after you know exchange listing
or something like that that will bring
you know that will upset you
upset investors so in the conventional
world there are
you know
um i mean maybe they're imperfect but
they're intended to be consumer
protection rules you know about share
lock-ups after ipos and
audited accounts for companies
honestly in advertisement
disclosures and things like that and
those are
you know say they're imperfect but they
arose from
previous century
uh rampant stock scams at the beginning
of the last century basically so they
they are intended to be about
consumer protection
samson
well i think uh in the long run it
doesn't really matter if they get it
wrong they can still fix it and the
whole point of having bitcoin is that
you don't have to care about this stuff
so yeah i mean if you had to worry about
what politicians are going to do to your
money then
you know then bitcoin kind of failed
like and i guess that could happen if
you rely on custodial services and
whatnot but the whole point is to have
your keys right to
have them in your possession
and you know they can't really mess
around with that if they choose to mess
around with that
um that's the that's the real point of
bitcoin that you have control over your
funds they're a bearer asset and
yeah i i i think those things just kill
industries they're industry killing
legislation that
it just gets rammed through sometimes
you still have ramifications from the
nydfs right like with the bid license
people are not going to operate in new
york under that kind of regime
and that's bad for people in new york
and if you take the infrastructure bill
if that went through as they had it
and you know
americans would suffer and it's up to
them to fix it you know either you
you
go through the proper channels and
replace the politicians and fix it or
you live with it that's the only two
choices you have really
at the end of the day i think ginsler's
a bitcoiner
it's very possible
what do you think adam
um well he certainly has a good
technical understanding
you know he was teaching courses on uh
bitcoin
mit
prior to taking his post
and there are videos online so it's good
that
uh you know regulation is informed
so we'll see i mean
i guess the
one of the questions on people's minds
is if a
bitcoin etf will finally
make it through the regulatory process
and
it's it's uh it's kind of past due in a
lot of ways in a sense that i i assume
some americans are buying the canadian
etfs of which there are now multiple and
you know certainly
some multiple in
on six the swiss stock exchange and
other places internationally so
the us has kind of been uh held back on
that and it's a big market so
you know i think
there are you know always some uh
bitcoin etfs in the application process
people who track these things but i
think there are more than usual at the
moment and some new entrants from
established financial players of
different flavors you know some big
players
big players yeah so some based on the um
futures because it's a way to get uh
i mean basically people are looking at
formulaically the reason why
previous
etfs have been nominally
turned down and
so i think going through the future
gives them access to the cme market
which is harder for the regulator to
criticize
all right guys that's all i have for you
um
give a hand off to uh if people want to
you know learn more about block stream
or whatever feel free to provide a
handoff i'm also going to have this john
pfeffer article in the show notes
for people to check that out and that
was the one that adam referenced earlier
but go ahead and take it away
yeah so if you want to look at
blockstream.com and everything is under
there
samson did you have anything else
because i know you're in the gaming
space do you have any game
uh stuff to hand off
well you can find blockstream on twitter
at
blockstream we're on facebook linkedin
basically everywhere
and if you're interested in games and
security tokens you can check out
infinite fleet infinite fleet.com
yeah all right we'll have that in the
show notes guys thank you so much for
making time i'm always just amazed every
time i get a chance to talk to you and
learn about all the things that are
happening out there with blockstream is
just mind-blowing but thank you for
making time
thanks kristen
thank you
thanks for watching make sure to
subscribe and hit that notification bell
so you don't miss out on the next
podcast episode and new investing
resources
what are your takeaways and thoughts on
this discussion let us know in the
comments section below
[Music]
you